Ricoh GR III EXIF Data
A cult street-photography compact; EXIF shows the fixed 28mm-equivalent lens and Ricoh shooting settings.
Make is RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. — with a comma, a period and internal spaces, which is the single most awkward manufacturer string in this database and reliably breaks anything that exports metadata to CSV without quoting. Model is the tidier RICOH GR III.
- Brand
- Ricoh
- Type
- Compact
- Sensor
- APS-C 24.2MP CMOS
- Resolution
- 6000 × 4000
- Megapixels
- 24 MP
- Released
- 2019
- ISO range
- ISO 100–102400
- EXIF Make
- RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
- EXIF Model
- RICOH GR III
- Embeds GPS
- No (unless paired)
Check your own GR III photo
Read the exposure and lens data your GR III wrote. It has no GPS receiver, so expect no coordinates.
Open EXIF ViewerEven without coordinates, the body and lens identify you. Remove the EXIF data before sharing; the pixels are copied through untouched.
- Fixed 18.3mm ƒ/2.8 (28mm equiv.)
Apply GR III settings to your photo
Tag any JPEG as if it was shot on the Ricoh GR III. The values below are pre-filled from this camera — tweak any of them, then apply. Your image pixels are never changed.
Drop a JPEG
Your photo stays in your browser.
GR III EXIF — FAQ
How do I view the EXIF data of a GR III photo?
Drop a JPEG from the GR III onto the ExifPixel EXIF Viewer. RAW files from this body carry the same fields plus maker notes, though a JPEG is the quicker way to see what the camera recorded.
Does the Ricoh GR III embed GPS location?
Not on its own. The GR III has no GPS receiver, so coordinates appear only if you paired a phone app or an external logger. A file from this body with location in it was tagged by something else.
What make and model does the GR III report in EXIF?
Make "RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD." and Model "RICOH GR III". Note that the Model string is not the retail name, so searching a photo library for "GR III" will not match these files; you have to search for "RICOH GR III".
Why does the focal length in my GR III photos look wrong?
It is not wrong, it is literal. EXIF records the physical focal length of the lens, and this is a APS-C body, so the field of view is 1.5× tighter than the number suggests. A 50 mm reading here frames like 75 mm on full frame.