OM System OM-1 EXIF Data
A weather-sealed MFT flagship. Note the 2× crop factor when reading its focal-length EXIF.
The most confusing Make on this list: OM Digital Solutions, the company that bought Olympus's camera business. Files from older bodies in the same lineage say OLYMPUS CORPORATION instead, so a single photographer's archive can carry two makers for what is effectively one system. Micro Four Thirds also doubles focal lengths, making a 25 mm lens frame like 50 mm.
- Brand
- OM System
- Type
- Mirrorless
- Sensor
- Micro Four Thirds 20.4MP stacked CMOS
- Resolution
- 5184 × 3888
- Megapixels
- 20 MP
- Released
- 2022
- Lens mount
- Micro Four Thirds
- ISO range
- ISO 80–102400
- EXIF Make
- OM Digital Solutions
- EXIF Model
- OM-1
- Embeds GPS
- No (unless paired)
Check your own OM-1 photo
Read the exposure and lens data your OM-1 wrote. It has no GPS receiver, so expect no coordinates.
Open EXIF ViewerEven without coordinates, the body and lens identify you. Remove the EXIF data before sharing; the pixels are copied through untouched.
Apply OM-1 settings to your photo
Tag any JPEG as if it was shot on the OM System OM-1. The values below are pre-filled from this camera — tweak any of them, then apply. Your image pixels are never changed.
Drop a JPEG
Your photo stays in your browser.
OM-1 EXIF — FAQ
How do I view the EXIF data of an OM-1 photo?
Drop a JPEG from the OM-1 onto the ExifPixel EXIF Viewer. RAW files from this body carry the same fields plus maker notes, though a JPEG is the quicker way to see what the camera recorded.
Does the OM System OM-1 embed GPS location?
Not on its own. The OM-1 has no GPS receiver, so coordinates appear only if you paired a phone app or an external logger. A file from this body with location in it was tagged by something else.
What make and model does the OM-1 report in EXIF?
Make "OM Digital Solutions" and Model "OM-1". This body is one of the more helpful ones: the string in the file is the name on the box, so searching a library for it works.
Why does the focal length in my OM-1 photos look wrong?
It is not wrong, it is literal. EXIF records the physical focal length of the lens, and this is a Micro Four Thirds body, so the field of view is 2× tighter than the number suggests. A 50 mm reading here frames like 100 mm on full frame.